| |
Philip's posts with tag: leftist
| Little Red Iron Dome and the Big Bad Wolf | By Moshe Feiglin Israel's government recently approved funding for the Iron Dome missile system, designed to intercept short and medium-range rockets targeted at Israel's cities. The system is expected to be ready in another five years.  | "Why are your wings so black?" Little Red Iron Dome asked Kassam the Wolf. "That's racism!" Kassam whined, and refused to shake her hand. He wasn't even willing to fly in the same airspace. Little Red Iron Dome hurriedly apologized and asked Kassam to forget past grievances. Just a millisecond before that, Little Red Iron Dom had flown out of the ruins of Sderot to prance through the clouds and gather a bit of security for Grandma. Suddenly, in the midst of a cloudburst, she met the Big Bad Wolf, Kassam. The two engaged in a timely, intellectual conversation: | Iron Dome: What is written there in Arabic on your side?
Kassam: Oh -- uhh -- It's just an old joke. It's not even funny anymore.
Iron Dome: Tell me anyway.
Kassam: Well, if you insist. When I was produced, ten years ago, we thought that Iron Dome would destroy me in two and a half years from now.
Iron Dome: And why is that funny?
Kassam: It says that I can be used until 2010!
Iron Dome: So what if I'm a few years late? Just try to get past me now!
Kassam: You wouldn't dare explode!
Iron Dome: Are you crazy? I should explode because of a rusty old pipe with a bit of Egyptian explosives? Do you know what I am made of?
Kassam: What?
Iron Dome (raises her nose and flutters): My steering wings are made of titanium, I have satellite tracking software, an integral GPS --
Kassam: And what? It doesn't explode?
Iron Dome: Sure it explodes! But do you know how much I cost? With the money spent on each Little Red Iron Dome like me, Israel can build three schools!
Kassam: So?
Iron Dome: Are you the last Kassam?
Kassam: Are you joking? Of course not! My brothers are on their way. The last shipment from Egypt was a bit delayed, but since the Disengagement, the Philadelphi Route is open and we can also lift off from Neveh Dekalim. The Jews are good people.
Iron Dome: I have an idea.
Kassam: That's great. I've never had an idea.
Iron Dome: All of you can go home and I will explode in Sderot instead of you.
Kassam (loses balance): What? Do you think I'm stupid? Why should I believe you?
Iron Dome: It will be just like the Disengagement! We will call it Unilateral Explosion. You can stay in your mosques and we will destroy ourselves!
Kassam: And if we don't agree?
Iron Dome (with sensitivity and determination): We will explode, nevertheless!
Kassam: And what about Ashkelon?
Iron Dome: Well, all right. But if you launch yourselves, we will really let you have it! And so, Kassam the Big Bad and Disappointed Wolf went home to Gaza. Just before his gentle landing, he was caught by an Israeli Air Force hunter who quickly released him because the criteria for defining terrorists had been made more flexible. In a virtuosic flight, Little Red Iron Dome flew right through the window of opportunity, exploded with a huge bang and triumphantly destroyed Sderot, Ashkelon and Tel Aviv. Bibi voted in favor and then hurried to resign in protest. The State Supremacist soldiers displayed national responsibility, overcame the voices of the extremists calling for conscientious objection and launched more Iron Domes on Jerusalem and Haifa. In a rare display of sympathy, Olmert announced that those who have relatives in Haifa (next of kin only) will shoot the Iron Domes at Jerusalem only and vice versa. Afterwards, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize and joined his sons in New York. Azmi Bashara was nice enough to take his place, the danger to democracy passed, Peres' dream was realized and Israel was accepted to the Arab League. |
Link: http://www.hlinc-zionsake.orgIsrael, Jews, Arabs, Islam from a Biblical Zionist perspective; includes Zionsake Publications; accommodates the following subdomains:
http://www.hlinc-zionsake.org/archive (of Zionsake Forum postings)
http://www.hlinc-zionsake.org/Babylon (Mystery Religions)
http://www.hlinc-zionsake.org/beliefs
http://www.hlinc-zionsake.org/high-places-israel (Israel's God's and demons)
http://www.hlinc-zionsake.org/objects (in Scripture - Biblical Garden)
http://www.hlinc-zionsake.org/israel-boundaries
| The Isaiah Plan The Isaiah Plan is the only formula that will bring peace, so "Peace off, Sister." [Condoleeza Rice? Zionsake] | | |  Though my father is not in this photo, here is a picture of Palestinian Jewish Parachutists in World War II. | U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is coming to the region for yet ANOTHER stab at peace. -The establishment of a Palestinian State. It's not enough that there are at least 22 Arab states already in existence, and only 1 tiny, tiny Israel. They want to chop us up some more, slice us to bits like salami, and place a Moslem 'Palestinian Terror State' right in the belly of Israel. This is where I live, this is where my house is, this is where my children were born and raised. This is where my ancestors lived. This is the region that G-d gave to the tribes of Ephraim, Benjamin and Judah. They want to cut our heart out, wrest Jerusalem from us, and make it into a Palestinian state. Dig down in the earth here, you will find JEWISH, not Arab artifacts. This is where Jewish Kings ruled. There were never any 'Palestinian' kings, and a country of 'Palestine' never existed. Palestine was the Jewish Homeland. My father was a 'Palestinian'. Most Arabs came in to this 'Jewish' region looking for work as more and more Jews came home and joined their brothers who were here for centuries. These Arabs would be insulted if they were called, 'Palestinians' which meant JEW. They were either Egyptians, or southern Syrians.There was never even an Arab Palestinian currency in all these centuries. The REGION known as Palestine was part of the Ottoman Empire (1299 to 1922) and therefore used TURKISH currency. When the British came in after WWI, they made the Land of Israel the ‘British Mandate of Palestine’, and the Egyptian pound was used until 1927. Egyptians swarmed into Israel for jobs, as the Arabs living in Gaza do today, crossing into Israel where they earn higher wages.  | | | The British then made what is called, the Palestinian pound, which was of course equal in value to the British pound sterling.  British Palestinian Pound with English, HEBREW, and Arabic on it. There was no such
thing as an Arab Palestinian currency. There was never any country called Palestine. | | | The 'Road Map' peace plan and the 'Two State Solution' peace plan are just another re-hashing of a failed policy, the formula of 'land for peace'. Each peace plan that has been shoved down the throats of the Israeli people in the last 30 years, has failed, and they have all been based on the 'land for peace' formula. Here are some of the latest peace plans and summits from the last 30 years that have all been based on the formula of 'land for peace'. All have utterly failed and literally 'bled' Israel. | Camp David Accords (1978)
The Reagan Peace Plan (September 1, 1982)
Madrid Conference of 1991
Oslo Accords (1993)
Wye River Memorandum (October 23, 1998)
The Clinton Peace Plan (December 23, 2000)
Mitchell Commission (Plan) ( October 17, 2000 ) Elon Peace Plan (2002)
Arab Peace Initiative (March 28, 2002)
The 2002 Nusseibeh-Ayalon Principles
The People's Voice (July 27, 2002)
March 2002 Saudi Peace Initiative
Geneva Accord (October 20, 2003)
Sharm el-Sheikh Summit of 2005 (February 8, 2005)
2006 Franco-Italian-Spanish Middle East Peace Plan The Tenet Plan (June 10, 2001)
Camp David 2000 Summit (2000)
Taba summit (January, 2001)
The Zinni Plan (March 26, 2002) Binational solution
Two-state solution
Saudi peace proposal
Red Sea Summit
The Road map | | | | | Did you skip over reading all those peace plans and summits? No fair. Read them each, and concentrate on them. We bled and paid a high price for each one of those 'solutions for peace'. What we should be saying to the U.S. administration is that we appreciate them wanting to make peace in the region, but they've gotten nowhere, except for weakening Israel and emboldening the Moslem Arab countries and terrorists. Thanks America, but no thanks. We'll handle it from here on out. Our great prophet, Isaiah said in 32:17: "The product of righteousness shall bring peace; and the effect of righteousness, quiet and security forever." Got it? I think our great prophet was smarter then Bush & Co., Clinton & Co. and Carter & Co.
So, I propose we stop with all these peace plans. We should aim for justice and righteousness. We should pursue, not 'peace', but our enemies. Israel must crush the terrorist infrastructure. Israel must bring the Arab nations who conspire against her to their knees until they beg us for peace and give us an unconditional surrender. The only way to stop this war, is to WIN it. The corrupt Palestinian Authority has forfeited its right to exist. It has encouraged, born, fostered, and sponsored terrorism. It has violated it's commitments it made in every peace treaty signed, which was to stop their violence and terror. We should mete out justice to those Arab terrorists and leaders who have spilled our people’s blood, to those Arab leaders who hold our soldiers captive, and to all the Arab and Moslem nations who conspire against us with threats of annihilation. | Justice we should pursue. We should demand the immediate criminal prosecution of the MUSLIM WAQF in JERUSALEM for destroying the Temple Mount. We should bring PA leader Mahmoud Abbas to justice for his terrorist past, his involvement in the Massacre of our young athletes in the 1972 Munich Olympics. He wrote his Ph.D. dissertation, later published as a book, by denying the Holocaust. We should also bring to justice any of our own leaders (whom I shall not name here) who have become corrupted, accepted bribes, armed our enemies, and released convicted terrorists. To these politicians who have sold themselves out, well, as an acquaintance of mine says, “They give ‘working girls’ a bad name. The Knesset today is the biggest brothel in Israel.” By pursuing justice and righteousness, the world will be a better place, a safer place, and a more peaceful place.
So to all those planning the slicing up of Israel like a salami in Annapolis this November, I say, "Peace off!" We are going with the 'Isaiah Plan'. Righteousness.
And the result of pursuing righteousness will bring us peace.
PEACE shall be the FRUIT of RIGHTEOUSNESS. | | |
Zionsake's Comment Posted to the blog
Israel's God, HaShem, took Father Avraham from Babylon to form a nation for Himself to serve as a vehicle for his plan of salvation for all the people of the earth, because Babylon had become the epicenter of Lucifer's (Satan's) domain and the place of origin of his mystery religions - including Roman Catholicism. In the end it didn't help, because his people, the Hebrews, still had a free will to choose, like the first Adam and Adamah, that caused them to start serving foreign gods (from Babylon) in their Promised land, that caused their exile back to Babylon. There they were forced to bow (at set times, mind you, as in Islam) before the statue Nebuchadnezzar had set up, which seems to have been an obelisk. To make a long story short, the obelisk has become one of the main symbols of Freemasonry, to which every WHO IS WHO among the Jews and gentiles in the world belongs. Ultimately Illuminized Freemasonry is Satanic and the people who belong to it run the world. Why would they then stomp out this EVIL that Bush failed to define, Islam, that is another phallic pole religion from Babylon - plus the fertility symbols of a moon god, that this Allah is? The answer is to get those who serve Babylonian gods to serve the living God of Israel who is represented on earth by the risen Immanuel, the Messiah and not by objects like poles, rocks, moons, statues, etc. PS. Thank you Tamar for the handy graphics in the posting! | |
| Leftists Photographed Staging "Settler Harassment of Arabs"Residents of Elon Moreh have photographed extreme-left activists deliberately damaging Arab property in order to create conflict. by Maayana Miskin and Ezra HaLevi 04 October 07 |  | | | (IsraelNN.com) Residents of the Shomron town of Elon Moreh have accused extreme-left activists of deliberately damaging Arab property in order to create conflict. They also say Yediot Acharonot and its associated website Ynet have refused to correct their libel. Benny Katzover, a senior founder of Elon Moreh, spoke with Arutz-7 and recounted the events leading up to what he says were attempts by left-wing activists to sully Jewish residents' good names and create conflict with the neighboring Arab village. The village in question, Dir el-Hattab, was hooked up to the Israeli water utility thanks to Katzover's own initiative as mayor of Elon Moreh. Recently, Jewish youth who refurbished a park area within Elon Moreh's municipal boundaries set up a small pool, connected to the water line leading to the village. The pool did not disrupt the flow of water to the village until somebody began cutting the pipe flowing toward the village. A resident of the town recently photographed leftists as they damaged a water pipe leading to a nearby Arab village. Elon Moreh residents argue that the leftists were hoping to lead the Arabs to think that their Jewish neighbors were destroying their water supply. After destroying the pipe, residents said, the leftists reported the incident to the Yediot Acharonot newspaper, which published an article accusing the Jews of Elon Moreh of harassing local Arabs and stealing their water. "They were more than happy to publish a half-page story on how we abuse our neighbors, without an ounce of research," Katzover said. He added that the leftists were led by Kibbutz Movement Chairman Yoel Marshak, infamous for his involvement in claims that Arab olive trees were destroyed by Jews, when in fact they had been pruned by their owners and left-wing activists. An Arab man quoted in the article was not even from the village of Dir el-Hattab to which the water in the pipe flows, one resident of Elon Moreh explained, but rather from the hostile village Kfar Salam. Yediot Acharonot ignored complaints from Elon Moreh, he said, and did not change the article even after receiving photographs of the leftists damaging the pipe.
| |
| The Battle for Eretz Yisrael-the Land of Israel’s Identity [Zionsake: and that of her God] By Tsafrir Ronen Israpundit 4 Sept. 2007 From the day the Zionist Movement was established, the historical meaning of settling the Land of Israel was the returning of the land to the Nation of Israel but mainly the returning the Hebrew identity to Eretz Yisrael-the Land of Israel. The pioneers who turned um-Juni to be Degania (the first kibbutz “collective farm”—established in 1909 by Jews in the areas of the Land of Israel then under Ottoman control), brought back the Hebrew identity. This was a piece of homeland that was conquered. The working brigade—35 young people from Gdud Ha’avoda—that turned “Ein Jalud” to Ein Harod (in the Jezreel Valley) brought the Biblical identity from Gideon times to the Valley. The establishment of Mishmar Ha’emek turned “Abu Shusha” hills to Mishmar Ha’emek hills. | | | | The establishment of Rosh Pinna (Rosh Pinna was settled in 1882 by a group of pioneers from Romania) turned “Jauni” to Guy-Oni (valley of strength) to Rosh Pinna. Each settlement returned each remote point in the Land to its Biblical Hebrew identity. The establishment of Elon Moreh (Elon Moreh is an Israeli settlement located in the Samarian Hills of the West Bank northeast of Shechem/Nablus on the slopes of Mount Kabir ridge; Elon Moreh represents the pioneering spirit of rebuilding the Land of Israel after 2000 years of exile. The community overlooks the city of Shechem) renewed the Israel identity of Biblical Elon Moreh.
The latest battle on Hebron is not a battle over two, pioneer families who renewed the Jewish life in Hebron. It is a battle on the identity of Hebron. If Jews are living in Hebron then Hebron’s identity will be Jewish. If only Arabs will be living in Hebron even her name Hebron will vanish to become el-Khalil (Shrine of the Friend). The Left want Hebron to have Arab identity. The hate for the settlements is their hate for the Land of Israel’s identity and their hate for Am Yisrael-the Nation of Israel. This is the entire story. However, it is not only Hebron. The Left does not want to see Jewish identity in Judea and Samaria. Their friends in the media continue calling the heart of the Land of Israel in foreign names that our enemies use i.e. “Palestine” as the androgynous Hadrianus Caesar named it; “West Bank, as King Hussein named it, “territories,” “occupation.” They will call the Biblical Land in any name possible but will not label it by the one name the gives her back her Jewish identity, Judea and Samaria, because Judea means the Land of the Jews and Eretz Yisrael means it is the Land of Am Yisrael-the Nation of Israel. Like Ire-Land is the Land of the Irish and Eng-Land the Land of the English and Fin-Land the Land of the Finish Israel-Land—that is the name of Eretz Yisrael-the Land of Israel—means the Land of the Israelis. The Identity of the Land is the same as the identity of the Nation residing in it, therefore the Nation of Israel cannot be an occupier of the Land of Israel. If not for the renewal of the settlements in Shiloh, Beit El, Elon Moreh, these names would have remained abstract Biblical names from some legend. The settlements created the renewal of the land’s identity and returned to its districts their real names and reclaimed from the Arab occupier the false Arabic identity. Shiloh recreated and renewed the Biblical town of Shiloh. If Judea and Samaria will be abandoned they it will not only be physically abandoned but also suffer identity abandonment. Again, in the world’s map the land will no longer be called Eretz Yisrael-the Land of Israel or Israel but another name. You see, until ’67 Judea and Samaria appeared in the world’s maps as “The West Bank of the Kingdom of Jordan.” The victory against the Jordanian military brought back the Biblical names. If you abandon these places the enemy will not call it by the Hebrew name rather by the false name, Palestine, an artificial name Hadrianus Caesar named it along his ambition to destroy the Jewish identity in Judea after he subdued Bar Kokhba revolt. Hadrianus’ curse did not succeed. With the years, the name Palestine was forsaken and forgotten. The Crusaders names the land “The Kingdom of Jerusalem.” The Arab occupation did not have a name for the land; she was known as South Syria. For 1300 years the land had no identity and absent of a nation that identified itself with it. No one claimed ownership but our nation. The British, when they halted immigration and settlements understood, what the anti Zionism among us understand too, that settling the land returns the Israeli identity to the land and each settlement that carries a Hebrew name turns to be a mile stone for the Hebrews. The battle is not of tanks or warplanes; today’s battle is the most crucial and decisive one, the battle on the identity of the Land. Whether she will have the pagan, false Arabic identity, Hadrianus Caesar falsehood identity, or she will have Biblical Israeli identity, the real name of the Land. This is the entire story. Only the settlements will return the Israeli identity to the Land. The Arabs demand that Olmert transfers the Land free and clear of Jews. As long as there are Jews in Judea, Judea could not be called by its false name Palestine. The only thing that stops the cadre of traitors from transferring our Land to the enemy, already at our gates, is their inability to uproot the settlements that halt the wheels of destruction. The building of tens of hundreds new settlements is our only guarantee that Eretz Yisrael-the Land of Israel will have Israeli identity. The wish to destroy the settlements is the wish to destroy the identity of the land, the Land of the Nation of Israel—the Land of Israel. Note: the fact is that there is already on its way an Arab, terrorist fascist-Nazi in the Land of Israel. This is a fact that was determined fourteen years ago. Today these facts are threatening to annihilate us. 800,000 Arabs live today on land they robbed from the State in the Negev, Ramlah, Lod, Galilee, the Jordan Valley and Jezreel Valley and Temple Mount is being destroyed without interruption. Posted by Ted Belman @ 1:35 pm | | |
Ari & Jeremy Declare War on Pastor Joel Hunter of Northland Church
After 30 Evangelical Pastors petition Bush to divide the Holy Land, it is time for Christians of the world to decide between fear of G-d and fear of man. light070814.mp3 (12.4 MB)
Zionsake: This is what Arial Sharon said about evacuating Jews from Hebron (before he became PM). Did he change sides when he became PM by telling the Jews, "Enough of this Messianism" (about the land) when he started preparing them for his "Disengagement," or was what he wrote about Hebron in 1994 just "politicking?" I would say it's the latter. Sharon grew up in the leftist kibbutz/moshav environment; he was Ben Gurion's henchmen in the Hagannah against the rightwing Etzel, Palmach, etc. brigades; he was in charge of the destruction of Yamit - that he did with the same fervor as when he destroyed the Jewish presence in Gaza and northern Shomron. His modus operandi was a classic example of the credo of the Jesuit founded Illuminized Freemasonry that he was part of: "The objective justifies the means." No wonder the Lord has turned him into a vegetable! | Ariel Sharon
August 17, 2007
This article was recently posted by AFSI and appeared as an advertisement sponsored by the Women in Green this morning on the front page of
the Jerusalem Post. (Special thanks to Nadia and Ruth Matar.)
(This article by Ariel Sharon, entitled "Israel Is Being Used As A Guinea Pig For The Oslo Peace Experiment" originally appeared in The Jewish Press on April 15, 1994)
It wasn't easy for me to come out with a public call last week to Israeli residents to oppose the evacuation of Jews from Hebron. Hebron is Jerusalem, NOT Yamit.
I called for passive, non-violent resistance against the declared intentions of the government in Hebron. It was only because I am convinced that the security and inalienable rights of Jews in every part of Eretz Yisrael will be irreversibly eroded if the government carries out its plans in Hebron, that I decided that we must arise and passively resist the uprooting of Jews from Hebron. And if, G-d forbid, the government does carry out its intention, it should know, in advance, that we will return to Hebron.
I have no doubt that the Jews in Israel and abroad feel that the government of Israel has lost its sense of Jewish-Zionist direction. The mere thought of sending IDF soldiers to evacuate Jews from Hebron is clear proof of this. Jews feel, justifiably, that the fate and future of the State of Israel is being threatened.
For most of my life I have obeyed orders as well as issued them as a soldier and commander in the IDF. Therefore, I am aware of the absolute importance of the duty incumbent on every soldier to carry out the legal orders, in order to preserve the military system which defends us.
At the same time, warning must be given, that if the Israeli government dares to uproot Jews from the heart of Eretz-Yisrael - a situation will develop in which the military will eventually have nothing to defend except itself, and will ultimately fall apart and disintegrate. After all, the IDF was organized to defend the Zionist settlement drive, which was threatened from the start as a result of Arab aggression, even before we returned home to Hebron. It was only with tremendous pain that we were able, in 1948, to retain part of Jerusalem.
If the government uproots the Jews of Hebron, it will be uprooting a vital cornerstone of the IDF -- which is indispensable for the defense of all parts of Israel. Therefore, although every soldier and commander must obey the legal orders of the government, so too, must every citizen in a democratic country ask himself what he is supposed to do when he is convinced that the policy of the government endangers him, his future and his family.
This question is a particularly burning one, with regard to the security of the Jewish state which is increasingly being jeopardized as the government continues to give the PLO a hold on our land by undermining and uprooting Jews from their homes.
Every Jew must feel as if he is personally going to be ousted from Hebron. Each one of us must understand that if we will not stand up to stop the uprooting of Jews form Hebron, we may very well - in the future - be uprooted from Tel Aviv, Haifa, Beer Sheba or from any other place.
In contrast to the days of exile, it is not only the right, but the obligation of every Jew, in a Jewish democratic state, to stand up and warn his government, through passive resistance, of the disaster that it is bringing upon all of us. What Jews could not do in Germany and Poland before their extermination, they must do in their own country. They have to rise en masse and resist.
Written by Ariel Sharon
www.hebron.com Ma'arat HaMachpela: www.machpela.com
Gift shop: www.hebrongifts.com
You too can Help Hebron - https://pro29.abac.com/hebron/english/donate.php
|
| Bibi Feeling the Heat | |  The fact that Bibi is going to such great and absurd extremes to disqualify Moshe Feiglin from the race shows that he is feeling the heat. Although he started the race completely confident in his easy victory, the daily polls that he takes reveal a startlingly different picture. Just today, a Likud internet poll shows Moshe Feiglin with over 50% support. Bibi trails behind him with over 40% support and Danino is far behind. The phone polls that Bibi takes verify this trend. Let's keep up the good work! Manhigut Yehudit needs your help now more than ever. You can also help create the Jewish majority revolution. Now is the time to support Manhigut Yehudit. Click here for our on line secure donation form. If you are in Israel, now is the time to volunteer to help. For more information, call (Israel) 02-996-1123. |
Jewish Israel
Video | Five Points from Moshe Feiglin |  | 1) Jewish Education for every child in Israel.
2) Jewish family values
3) Security: Know your enemy and win
4) A justice system that represents Jewish values
5) Zero tolerance to the Arab rebellion |
Netanyahu is not much better than Olmert A Feiglin Victory Equals A Safer America | |  | | On August 14th Likud members will go to the polls to choose the Likud Chairman Of the two candidates running for head of Likud, only one - Moshe Feiglin - has a platform that does not reward or appease terrorists. The policies of Israel’s present Olmert government which have led to chaos and lives lost is only a stone’s throw away from those of Feiglin’s opposition Benjamin Netanyahu. Territorial concessions on Israel’s divinely given land, and appeasement of the terrorists of any kind, are a betrayal of the values that make Israel a proud Jewish state and the consequences have been the formation of a safe haven for terrorists which is a threat to both Israel and to the United States. Netanyahu continues on the deadly Oslo Accords train, which was criminally conceived to remake Yasser Arafat the murderer into a statesman. Arafat, who invented airplane-hijacking and who mass-produced the use of suicide bombers in Israel, inspired the suicide bombers who murdered 3,000 Americans in New York City in 2001. September 11th apparently wasn’t a big enough wake up call in Israel as Olmert and Netanyahu are now still attempting to reinvent Arafat’s partner, the holocaust denier and alleged financier of the massacre at Munich - Mahmoud Abbas as a “genuine partner for peace”. While they play the game of which terrorist is more “moderate”, an Al Quaida base with the potential to wreak havoc on the western world is thriving where beautiful Jewish communities recently flourished in the Gaza Strip. According To Former Knesset Member Elyakim Haeztni, the Likud UNDER NETANYAHU is expressly on the [appeasement-loving] LEFT. Moshe Feiglin will bring the Likud back to it’s nationalistic roots, where it should be. Posted by Ted Belman @ 7:05 pm | 
Zionsake Beliefs
|
| Reuters - Thursday, July 12 01:39 pm |  | PARIS (Reuters) - Israel's Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni rules out resuming talks with Syria and believes Damascus poses a problem which must be tackled by the region, she said in a French magazine published on Thursday. Her comments contrasted with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's recent offers of direct talks if Syrian President Bashar al-Assad cuts ties to Iran as well as Palestinian and Lebanese Islamist militant groups. Interviewed last week by Le Nouvel Observateur, Livni was asked whether she could confirm rumours of a resumption in talks between Israel and Syria, a year after fighting erupted between Israel and Syrian-backed Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon. "Absolutely not. Syria is pursuing the dangerous game it plays in the region. It is supporting Hezbollah, refusing the principle of independence for Lebanon and remains a threat," she said. "Moreover, Damascus, which is still the regional centre of support for terrorism, is today associated with Iran in a partnership which also constitutes a danger." Olmert this week repeated his offer of direct talks with Assad on returning the Golan Heights, captured in a war 40 years ago and annexed in 1981 in a move declared null by the U.N. Security Council. United Nations special envoy Michael Williams told Reuters on Thursday that Syria had signalled a willingness to change its relationship with Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas if progress were made towards a peace deal with Israel. "For Israel, it is very clear, beyond the Israeli-Syrian dispute, peace with Damascus requires a clarification which concerns the whole of the region," Livni told Le Nouvel Observateur. Livni also brushed off suggestions that it would be better for Israel to retreat from the West Bank as soon as possible: "It would above all run the risk of seeing the West Bank sink into civil war and resemble what Gaza has become." 
 | A Culture of Loyalty | | Manhigut Yehudit Weekly Update July 5. Issue: 6739 Excerpted and translated from Moshe Feiglin's book, "The War of Dreams." Rosh Chodesh Elul, 5760
August, 2000 | The basic disagreement that is tearing the Israeli public into (very unequal) pieces does not really relate to solving Israel's problems with the Arabs. The disagreement is a fundamental cultural rift -- a conflict between the culture of loyalty and the culture of betrayal. "Are you crazy?!" Yossi Beilin bellowed when asked why Israel betrayed the South Lebanese Army. "If we had left them there, the Hizbollah would have shot at them, they would have shot back, and then the Hizbollah would have shot at Israel!" In effect, Beilin admitted that Israel chose to betray the soldiers of the South Lebanese Army, who had risked their lives for us -- simply because at that moment it did not pay to remain loyal. The interviewer did not continue to question Beilin on that point, because he accepted his response as completely sensible. To a person who has chosen the culture of betrayal, Beilin's excuses make perfect sense. The culture that rules today in the State of Israel is the culture of betrayal. A person who is loyal to his wife, to his family, to his nation and to his heritage is necessarily going to be loyal to his land and his allies. Opposite him stand those who place themselves at the center of existence. They will obviously choose the path of betrayal -- starting with those closest to them and extending to every type of relationship in which they have a part. We cannot expect a person whose culture is not based on loyalty to suddenly display faithfulness at a certain point, no matter how talented or educated he may be. As soon as conflict arises between short term gain and long term principles -- the principles (and promises) will evaporate. Before we demand that a candidate of the National Camp nullify the fiascos of the Left, we must demand an answer to the most important question: What is his cultural base? To what values is our candidate truly loyal -- other than himself? We must demand that he inform us not only of his plans to bring our State peace and security, but more importantly, why he thinks we need a Jewish state in the first place. Many Leftists have already openly declared that a Jewish state is unnecessary. Please explain, Mr. Candidate, why they are mistaken. These are not philosophical questions. Reality has already proven that if there is no true answer to these basic questions, the Right's candidate will also necessarily fulfill the policies of the Left.
 Theater J's Shattering 'Pangs of the Messiah' By Peter Marks Washington Post Staff Writer Saturday, June 30, 2007; Page C01 The corrosive effects of perpetual crisis wear almost as meaningfully on an audience as they do on the characters of "Pangs of the Messiah," Motti Lerner's heated and ultimately heartbreaking portrait of a besieged Jewish settlement on the West Bank. The time in which this provocative Israeli playwright sets his drama is a few years into the future, but the scenario he unfolds feels entwined with the tragic here and now. In the play, at the Goldman Theater, a peace accord is about to be signed in Washington between the Israeli government and the Palestinians that will cede the West Bank to a formal state of Palestine -- a change that will mean the enforced removal of Shmuel (Michael Tolaydo) and his fellow settlers from the hilly enclave to which they have dedicated their lives. From left, Joel Reuben Ganz, Lindsay Haynes, Alexander Strain and Laura Giannarelli in Motti Lerner's updated drama about Jewish settlers in a near future forced to move from a new Palestine. (By Stan Barouh -- Theater J) Lerner lays out the spectrum of passionate reactions within Shmuel's circle to convulsive, swiftly evolving political events in ways that give intriguing complexity to a people and a movement often painted as a monolithic cadre of occupiers. The playwright's tale is apocalyptic rather than sympathetic -- it's about the inexorable pull of extremism, and the amplification of suffering to which radical beliefs inevitably lead. Yet, regardless of your preconceptions, Lerner compels you to see not only the array of viewpoints on the side of the Israeli settlers but also the faces. The play is a visit with those who reside in the vicinity of doom, in a neighborhood that seems both sun-kissed and cursed. Director Sinai Peter's splendid production for Theater J -- featuring sharply drawn performances by, among others, Tolaydo, Laura Giannarelli as Shmuel's wife, Amalia, and Alexander Strain as their fragile son, Nadav -- marks the play's first performance in English, according to the company. (The fine translation is by Anthony Berris.) Lerner wrote it in Hebrew 20 years ago, when its title was "Waiting for the Messiah"; in addition to modifying the title, he has updated events and specified the year as 2012. However, the fictional political developments he describes in "Pangs of the Messiah," as reported throughout by the voice of an actual newsman, Dan Raviv, never seem outlandish. (That the play holds up after two decades speaks as much as anything to the intractability of the issues it examines.) In contrast to Lerner's fascinating if hyperbolic "Murder of Isaac," a piece set in a post-traumatic-stress ward among the disabled veterans of all of Israel's wars -- and which had an American premiere last year at Baltimore's Center Stage -- "Pangs" frames its arguments in fairly sober and naturalistic terms. The setting is the sleek hilltop home of Shmuel, a rabbi and a leader of the settlement, who, Lerner suggests, is the embodiment of a paradox. He's both spiritual and practical. He's enough of a moderate to be on speaking terms with Israel's conciliatory-seeming prime minister, yet sufficiently devout in his investment in a Jewish state that includes the West Bank. As the prospects for the peace agreement intensify, so do the fissures in Shmuel's family; the settlers appear to be more furious at their own government than at their Arab neighbors. Hard-liners such as Shmuel's son Avner (John Johnston) and son-in-law Benny (Joel Reuben Ganz) -- the latter having been in prison for killing Palestinians with roadside bombs -- agitate for resistance against the Israeli army, while Avner's wife, Tirtzah (Becky Peters), argues vehemently against any kind of violence. Caught in the middle are the innocents, such as Strain's tenderly rendered Nadav, a simple soul who is joyously engaged in the building of his own home, and who does not quite grasp the huge moral and political implications that this normally mundane activity has acquired. The ideal audience for "Pangs" might be one with some familiarity with Israeli politics. Sorting out the ideological branches of Shmuel's family tree becomes a bit labored in Lerner's more schematic first act. We learn, for instance, that Avner and Tirtzah have just arrived from Washington, where Avner had some role representing the settlers' interests. It takes some time, too, to understand all the facets of Shmuel's responsibilities in a community fragmenting over the potential peace treaty. But these concerns are allayed in the second act, as the momentum of outside events accelerates and Shmuel must try to reconcile the precepts of his faith with the struggle over his settlement's destiny. Set designer Kinereth Kisch picturesquely realizes Shmuel's world: a living room full of glass and light overlooking a handsome valley of modern houses. In bright costumes by Dalia Penn that look as if they were inspired by citrus groves, the family members shuffle in and out in nonstop rotation, coming to rest only when the flickering of a TV news broadcast catches their eyes. It's as if their nerves are so frayed that they cannot bear to engage one another for more than a few minutes at a time. The director and actors bring Shmuel's family to vibrant life, from Lindsay Haynes's terrific Chava, broken by worry that husband Benny will return to a life of terrorism, to Giannarelli's excellent Amalia, wed as much to a man's religious dream as the man himself. Ganz, Johnston, Peters and Norman Aronovic contribute solidly. And the exceptional Tolaydo takes us resonantly with him on Shmuel's path from adroit mover and shaker to anguished bystander. While it might be helpful to know something about the Middle East at the outset of "Pangs of the Messiah," Lerner's shattering conclusion requires no information at all. It's the universal handbook of human frailty that is his poignant guide, and ours. By Motti Lerner. Directed by Sinai Peter. Lighting, Martha Mountain; composer, Hannah Hakohen; sound, Clay Teunis. About 2 hours 15 minutes. At Goldman Theater, D.C. Jewish Community Center, 1529 16th St. NW. Call 800-494-TIXS or visit http://www.boxofficetickets.com.
Israel and the Jews' gravest enemies are actually the "ANTI-JEW JEWS" the Israelis have been voting into power over the years, e.g. -
Ben Gurion who destroyed the Palmach, Etzel etc., and was quite willing to succumb to Nasser in '67, -
Golda Meir who would have caused Israel to be destroyed in the '73 Yom Kipur War had Israel's God not intervened, -
Shimon Peres who created the Oslo Trojan Horse that caused the deaths of about 1200? Israelis in terror attacks, -
Ehud Barak who, by his desertion from South Lebanon, enabled Syria to hijack Lebanon and build-up Hizballah, equipping them with thousands of missiles - with 99%? input from Iran, -
Arial Sharon who caused Hamas to rise to power because they could boast that they had driven the Jews from of Gaza - plus creating the present security disaster from smuggled arms into Gaza, including missiles, -
Olmert, Sharon's lackey who caused Hizballah to become a political power, due to the Lebanese people not blaming them for Olmert's senseless bombarding and destruction of Lebanon - and, of course, enabling them to say that they had won the war. It's the result of this Jewish thinking that "we don't have rights," that causes them not to even think to stand on national rights, or trusting Israel's God - like the majority of the Israelites that supported the defeatist views of the ten spies about the unbeatability of the people in Canaan . Then, of course, there are some things the Israeli electorate could not foresee, like the undemocratic deception of Arial Sharon to use the rightwing to come into power and then returning to his Labor roots by executing the Labor Party's policies of abandonment of land to the enemy. Not to mention, Olmert who became PM-by-default by being Sharon's yes-man. Bibi Netanyahu is even worse, he makes these rightwing noises until he becomes PM and then takes his cue from his masters on Capital Hill and the CFR. Now he has the gall to say, "I told you so," about the mess in Gaza, while he could have prevented the Disengagement by voting against it - and guiding other yes-people, seat-lovers Limor Livnat and Silvan Shalom to do the same. The leaders of the religious parties are more of the same. What did they do to prevent Sharon's disengagement? Then, worst of all, the Shas Council of Torah Sages unanimously supporting the election of arch Freemason, Shimon Peres as President. It shows that they are Lodge partners! In conclusion, the complete bias of the Israeli judiciary in favor of MULTI-CULTURALISM needs to be mentioned. It's ROOTS are betrayed by the architecture of the Supreme Court Building in Jerusalem and the symbols you find all over the place: It is a Masonic Lodge!! A friend of mine told me the other day that he had risen in corporate business in South Africa until he had reached a level where he couldn't go any further. The reason: he refused to become a Freemason. He said, it's the same all over the world. If you want to see who a lot of them are, see http://www.peres-center.org/FullList.html
 By avoiding war, the US and Israel are inviting war or embracing defeat By Ted Belman http://www.israpundit.com/2006/?p=4946 June 8, 2007 In a recent post I argued that Israel’s choice, either occupy Gaza or embrace Arab “peace” plan. By this I meant Israel must decide whether it wants a peace process or a war process. It can’t avoid war and avoid the “Arab peace” initiative at the same time. Olmert’s overtures to Syria underscores his choice. Caroline Glick’s current column James Baker’s disciples argues that Bush has made the same choice. After discussing how Bush wants Israel to supply arms to Fatah that will be used against Israel and is intent on supplying the latest technology to Saudi Arabia and Egypt that will also be used against Israel, goes on to explain,
The Bush administration is not just asking Israel to facilitate the arming of its enemies. It is also placing restrictions on Israel’s ability to arm itself. As The Jerusalem Post reported on Wednesday, the Pentagon has yet to respond to Israel’s request to purchase the F-22 stealth bomber. Moreover, the US seems to be torpedoing Israel’s acquisition of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. The Pentagon recently voiced its objection to Israel’s plan to install Israeli technology in the jets that are to be supplied starting in 2014. Israel’s installation of its own electronic warfare systems in its F-16s and F-15s is what has allowed the IAF to maintain its qualitative edge over Arab states that have also purchased the aircraft. THE ADMINISTRATION’S display of hostility toward Israel is unfortunately not an aberration. It is the result of a policy shift that occurred immediately after the Republican Party’s defeat in the Congressional elections in November. After the defeat, the administration embraced former secretary of state James Baker’s foreign policy paradigm, which is based on the belief that it is possible and desirable to reach a stable balance of power in the Middle East. As Baker sees it, this balance can be reached by forcing Israel to shrink to its “natural” proportions and assisting supposedly moderate and stable states like Egypt and Saudi Arabia to grow into their “natural” proportions. Once the states of the region (including Syria and Iran, which Baker wishes to appease) have settled into their proper proportions, stability will be ensured. She describes the inherent lack of stability in the ME and argues, Aside from that, the specter of a nuclear-armed Iran throws a monkey wrench into any thought of regional stability. A look around the region shows just how absurd Baker’s notions truly are. [..] Furthermore, the paragons of moderation and stability in Egypt and Saudi Arabia that Baker and his followers are so keen to strengthen are neither stable nor moderate. Both Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Saudi King Abdullah are old men of uncertain health. To “stabilize” their regimes, they wrought unholy alliances with the Muslim Brotherhood and the Wahabis, the only forces in Egyptian and Saudi societies that have not been flattened under their jackboots. This week, Channel 10 reported that the Bush administration recently informed Israel and the Gulf states that it has no intention of launching military strikes against Iran’s nuclear installations. The Americans explained that they need Iranian assistance in stabilizing Iraq to pave the way for an American withdrawal from the country before Bush leaves office. Under Baker’s regency, the administration apparently now subscribes to the belief that they will be better off out of Iraq and with a nuclear-armed Iran, than in Iraq without a nuclear-armed Iran. In the hope of avoiding war, both the US and Israel are inviting war. Posted by Ted Belman @ 9:11 am |
[Text of my recorded message - I hope my listeners will not criticize me for not being a professional when it comes to voice recording!]
Shalom Friend, and thank you for visiting Zionsake.
I hope you don't mind if I speak to you while you look around the site!!??
I feel that there are such important things that need to be said about what is going on here in Israel, that I want to say them ALOUD. I will anyway also post what I say in writing - with additions and corrections.
Firstly, there have been clear indications for quite a while that Syria is preparing to attack Israel. This threat must have become more serious, AND That might be why the Olmert government is suddenly frantically investigating the possibility of entering into peace talks with Syria. In fact, I heard this morning that Olmert has offered Syria the Golan on a platter. And the ministers are outdoing each others in attempts to assure the Syrians that Israel doesn't have plans to attack them.
It is an attempt to avert war, because it does not fit the agenda of Israel's leaders to fight and conquer Israel's enemies!
What do I mean by this far fetched statement?
It can be explained by using the inconceivable situation that leftists and anarchist Jews have been demonstrating the last days in solidarity with the Arabs about the tragedy that Israel managed to win the Six Day War in 1967!!!!!
They don't even care to think what would have happened had Israel lost that war! Then the Sunnis & Shiites might have been killing each other in the streets of Jerusalem and not in Baghdad!
The reason for this situation is explained by the definition of what a leftist is about in Israel and the West, namely, IT IS SOMEONE WHO FIGHTS FOR THE ENEMY!
What most people don't know is that the Jewish leaders who fought for a homeland for the Jews, including Theodore Herzel, were leftist Zionists, and so were most of the Israeli governments from Ben Gurion until today.
Being leftists they have been doing what leftists do!
They fought for the enemy, but in a subtle way by only reacting minimally to aggression and provocative action of the enemy. [Except of course where God intervened to let Israel win - as in the major wars from 1948 to 1973]
Why is that? It is because they need the enemy to keep them in power and to help them to achieve their goal.
They call this goal PEACE, but it is just a cover-up for what their real agenda is, namely to establish a system and standards that are the complete opposite of God's guidelines in the Bible for Israel and the nations.
Elohim showed exactly what he wanted and still wants when he dispersed the people of the world when they tried to set up a one world system in Babel.
God wants sovereign nations & Satan wants a one world system!!!
AND here is the real problem!!!
There are Jews among those people in the world who are conspiring to achieve a NWO.
AND it is this type of Jew who has for the most part been the leaders of Israel since 1948.
But I'll tell you more about that after this piece has run for a few days.
Quote from the recording: I feel that there are such important things that need to be said about what is going on here in Israel, that I want to say them ALOUD. I will anyway also post what I say in writing - with additions and corrections.
| Message 1 about Israeli Politics | | | | | |
|
|
— June 8, 2007 @ 
— June 8, 2007 @ 
— June 9, 2007 @ 
Netanyahu has already said he would include Labor in his “broad-based” coalition. So what is going to be different? The U.S. and their fellow globalist conspirators will still call the shots!Netanyahu is not a “son of Zion,” he is a “son of Greece” as the Bible defines the anti-Bible Freemasons, Hellenists, etc.
Comment by zionsake